🔗 Share this article

A century-old oak tree crashed down on the first day of a vacation. Minutes after James and his partner Andrew had finished breakfasting on the terrace, the enormous tree destroyed their table and chairs and crushed their rental car's windscreen.

The rental cottage in Provence, France was covered by branches that shattered the living room window and harmed the roof. "I was convinced the ceiling would collapse," James remembers. "Had it fallen minutes earlier, we could have been seriously injured or killed."

Had it fallen moments earlier we would have been seriously injured or fatally wounded

Emergency repairs took 24 hours after the host winched the tree off the property, but the shaken couple feared the building might be structurally unsound and decided to reserve a hotel for the rest of their week-long stay.

The booking platform remained unperturbed. "We understand this may have caused some inconvenience," stated the first of many similar automated messages before closing the pending case with a cheerful "Stay safe. Stay healthy."

The host also showed little concern. "All that happened was you experienced a loud sound and observed a tree lying on the terrace," she replied to the couple's refund request. "You decided to remember the anxiety and trauma rather than cherishing a special memory."

Peak Season Vacation Problems Emerge

Now that the summer season has ended, numerous travel nightmare accounts are coming to light.

Unlucky travelers report being trapped inside or locked out their accommodation – when it existed – or left stranded at night in strange cities when it wasn't. Accounts include dirty bedrooms, dangerous equipment and unauthorized sublets. One common factor connects these ruined holidays: they were booked through digital reservation services that refused refunds.

The expansion of booking websites has prompted a increase in travelers organizing their own holidays. These platforms display worldwide property listings on their websites and guarantee to fulfill travel dreams on a budget.

Consumer protections, however, have not caught up with their popularity.

Regulatory Gaps

Package-deal customers have legal recourse for holiday disasters under consumer travel regulations, but those who reserve accommodation through online booking services find themselves reliant on their host's willingness to help.

Some platforms promote additional protections, but your agreement is with the person or company offering the accommodation.

James and Andrew had spent £931 for their week in the Provençal cottage and when they felt sufficiently endangered to return, ended up paying twice that for a hotel. They have yet to receive notification about whether they are responsible for the broken rental car. Despite the platform's protection pledge to reimburse customers for major issues, the company stated it was up to the host to agree a refund; the host insisted the determination was the platform's.

After two and a half months of similar automated messages in response to James's complaint, the platform declared the case had dragged on long enough and abruptly ended it. The host concluded that since repairs had cost her €5,000 (£4,350), she would not be offering a refund either. She proposed that instead the couple celebrate their survival and "turn the event into a positive story."

The platform finally issued a complete reimbursement along with a £500 voucher after questions were raised about its health and safety policies.

Locked In

Kim Pocock used a booking platform to book a flat for a weekend stay in Barcelona. She and her daughter were stuck inside the property for most of their only full day in the city after a security lock on the front door failed.

"The host sent a maintenance man, who was unable to help," she says. "They eventually called a locksmith who attempted for multiple hours to access the lock from the outside. He had to buy a rope, which he tossed up to our window and we lifted up a tool and tools. With us prying the lock from the inside and the locksmith banging it from the outside, we finally managed to extract it. It was discovered unfastened bolts had blocked the mechanism. By then it was nearly 4pm."

We would have been at serious risk if there had been an crisis while we were locked in, yet the host blamed us for using the lock

Pocock requested a complete reimbursement to make up for her spoiled trip and the anxiety. The booking platform said this was at the discretion of the host. The host not only refused, but withheld her €250 deposit to cover the new lock. The deposit was eventually returned by the platform but Pocock felt she was owed the €446 rental cost.

Another platform customer, Philip, was locked out the London flat he reserved for £70 when, upon attempting to check in, he found the lockbox empty. The owners told him they were overseas and could not help and suggested him to find somewhere else for the night. He paid an extra £123 on a hotel room and has spent the intervening four months trying in vain to get this refunded.

"The platform has basically said that as the owner isn't responding to them there's nothing they can do," he states. "I can't comprehend how a business can operate this way with no accountability. The additional disappointment is that the property in question is continues being advertised on the platform."

The platform refunded both customers after intervention. The company verified the host who had left Philip out of his rental had failed to its inquiries. When asked why dishonest accommodation providers were not removed, it said customers should read guest feedback to ensure a property was "suitable for them."

Rating Processes

Ratings do not always reveal the complete picture. A recent investigation highlighted that one platform's standard setup was showing reviews it considered "relevant." This means that it is simple for users to miss a recent flood of reviews cautioning that a listing is a scam or not available.

The platform countered that customers could easily sort reviews by the newest or lowest score so as to make their own choice on a property.

The same report stated that listings that had been repeatedly reported as scams were not removed. The platform answered that it relied on hosts to abide by its terms and conditions and ensure that booking information was up to date.

Regulatory Uncertainty

The problem for travelers who do not get what they paid for is that their legal agreement is with the accommodation provider rather than the booking platform.

Major platforms commit to help find other accommodation in an crisis, but getting compensation for a interrupted stay is a more difficult struggle. Both tend to rely on the owner to do the right thing.

The industry needs more regulation, according to consumer protection experts. "Since online platforms essentially self-regulate, the only option if the dispute continues is legal action," experts say. "But against whom? As the contract is between you and the host you'd have to take court proceedings in their country."

They continue: "You could argue that the online marketplace failed to look into your complaint thoroughly and try to pursue them, but this is a legal uncertainty. Both firms are registered abroad and have deep pockets."

Government authorities say new consumer protection legislation requires online platforms to "exercise professional diligence" in relation to consumer transactions promoted or made on their platforms.

A spokesperson states: "Government agencies are on the side of consumers and we have implemented tough new fines for breaches of consumer law to protect people's money."

They added: "Businesses selling services to local consumers must follow national law, and we have strengthened regulatory authorities' powers to make sure they face substantial penalties if they do not."